4.6 Article

Survival outcomes for patients with stage IVB vulvar cancer with grossly positive pelvic lymph nodes: Time to reconsider the FIGO staging system?

期刊

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
卷 136, 期 2, 页码 269-273

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.12.013

关键词

Vulva; Vulvar cancer; Stage IVB; Pelvic lymph nodes; Radiation therapy

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA016672] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To evaluate treatment outcomes for patients with vulvar cancer with grossly positive pelvic lymph nodes (PLNs). Methods. From a database of 516 patients with vulvar cancer, we identified patients with grossly positive PLNs without distant metastasis at initial diagnosis. We identified 20 patients with grossly positive PLNs; inclusion criteria included PIN 1.5 cm or larger in short axis dimension on CT/MRI (n = 11), FOG-avid PLN on PET/CT (n = 3), or biopsy-proven PLN disease (n = 6). Ten patients were treated with chemoradiation therapy (CRT), 4 with RT alone, and 6 with various combinations of surgery, RT or CRT. Median follow-up time for patients who had not died of cancer was 47 months (range, 4-228 months). Results. Mean primary vulvar tumor size was 6.4 cm; 12 patients presented with 2009 AJCC T2 and 8 with T3 disease. All patients had grossly positive inguinal nodes, and the mean inguinal nodal diameter was 2.8 cm. The 5-year overall survival and disease specific survival rates were 43% and 48%, respectively. Eleven patients had recurrences, some at multiple sites. There were 9 recurrences in the vulva, but no isolated nodal recurrences. Four patients developed distant metastasis within 6 months of starting radiation therapy. Conclusions. Aggressive locoregional treatment can lead to favorable outcomes for many patients with grossly involved PLNs that is comparable to that of grossly involved inguinal nodes only. We recommend modification of the FIGO stage IVB classification to more accurately reflect the relatively favorable prognosis of patients with PLN involvement (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据