4.6 Article

Evaluating the ovarian cancer gonadotropin hypothesis: A candidate gene study

期刊

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
卷 136, 期 3, 页码 542-548

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.12.017

关键词

Ovarian cancer; Gene; Gonadotropins; Genetics; Polymorphisms; Genetic variation

资金

  1. US National Cancer Institute [R01-CA076016]
  2. European Commission's Seventh Framework Programme grant [223175 HEALTH F2 2009-223175]
  3. Genetic Associations and Mechanisms in Oncology (GAME-ON)
  4. NCI Cancer Post-GWAS Initiative [U19-CA148112]
  5. Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium - Ovarian Cancer Research Fund [PPD/RPCI.07]
  6. Cancer Research UK [16561, 15960] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Cancer Research UK
  8. The Francis Crick Institute [10124] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Ovarian cancer is a hormone-related disease with a strong genetic basis. However, none of its high-penetrance susceptibility genes and GWAS-identified variants to date are known to be involved in hormonal pathways. Given the hypothesized etiologic role of gonadotropins, an assessment of how variability in genes involved in the gonadotropin signaling pathway impacts disease risk is warranted. Methods. Genetic data from 41 ovarian cancer study sites were pooled and unconditional logistic regression was used to evaluate whether any of the 2185 SNPs from 11 gonadotropin signaling pathway genes was associated with ovarian,cancer risk. A burden test using the admixture likelihood (AML) method was also used to evaluate gene-level associations. Results. We did not find any genome-wide significant associations between individual SNPs and ovarian cancer risk. However, there was some suggestion of gene-level associations for four gonadotropin signaling pathway genes: INHBB (p = 0.045, mucinous),LHCGR (p = 0.046, high-grade serous), GNRH (p = 0.041, high-grade serous), and FSHB (p = 0.036, overall invasive). There was also suggestive evidence for INHA (p = 0.060, overall invasive). Conclusions. Ovarian cancer studies have limited sample numbers, thus fewer genome-wide susceptibility alleles, with only modest associations, have been identified relative to breast and prostate cancers. We have evaluated the majority of ovarian cancer studies with biological samples, to our knowledge, leaving no opportunity for replication. Using both our understanding of biology and powerful gene-level tests, we have identified four putative ovarian cancer loci near INHBB, LHCGR, GNRH, and FSHB that warrant a second look if larger sample sizes and denser genotype chips become available. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据