4.5 Article

Structure-property relationship study of the HPLC enantio-selective retention of neuroprotective 7-[(1-alkylpiperidin-3-yl)methoxy]coumarin derivatives on an amylose-based chiral stationary phase

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
卷 41, 期 6, 页码 1376-1384

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201701442

关键词

chiral recognition; coumarins; linear free energy relationships; molecular docking; polysaccharides

资金

  1. APQ Research Apulian Region FutureInResearch-Regional program for smart specialization and social and environmental sustainability Fondo di Sviluppo e Coesione [FKY7YJ5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The enantiomer separation of a number of racemic 7-[(1-alkylpiperidin-3-yl)methoxy] coumarin derivatives, some of which show outstanding in vitro multitarget neuroprotective activities, was successfully achieved on a polysaccharide-based chiral stationary phase, bearing amylose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) as a chiral selector, in normal polar mode (methanol and acetonitrile as the mobile phases). The majority of the screened selectands, especially those bearing 1-(3-X-benzyl) piperidin-3-yl moieties, showed baseline enantiomer separations, and compound 8 (X = NO2) was the best resolved (alpha = 2.01; R-S = 4.27). Linear free energy relationships, usefully complemented by molecular docking calculations, have the key role in enantioselective retention of aromatic interactions between pi-donor moieties in the chiral selector and pi-acceptor moieties in selectand, strengthened by hydrogen bond interaction between a hydrogen bond donor in the chiral selector and the hydrogen bond acceptor group(s) in the selectand. Statistically, reliable equations highlighted the importance of the substituent's size and substitution pattern (meta better than para) to affect the enantiorecognition of the title compounds. The chromatographic data support the scalability of the optimized experimental conditions for preparative purposes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据