4.5 Article

Solid-phase microextraction based on an agarose-chitosan-multiwalled carbon nanotube composite film combined with HPLC-UV for the determination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in aqueous samples

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
卷 41, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201800064

关键词

blended agarose; chitosan; composite adsorbents; multiwalled carbon nanotubes; nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; solid-phase microextraction

资金

  1. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia [R.J130000.7309.4B222 (L/ICA/ICB/201528/15), 600-IRMI/MyRA 5/3/LESTARI (098/2017)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe the preparation, characterization, and application of a composite film adsorbent based on blended agarose-chitosan-multiwalled carbon nanotubes for the preconcentration of selected nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in aqueous samples before determination by high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. The composite film showed a high surface area (4.0258m(2)/g) and strong hydrogen bonding between the multiwalled carbon nanotubes and agarose/chitosan matrix, which prevent adsorbent deactivation and ensure long-term stability. Several parameters, such as sample pH, addition of salt, extraction time, desorption solvent, and concentration of multiwalled carbon nanotubes in the composite film were optimized using a one-factor-at-time approach. The optimum extraction conditions obtained were as follows: isopropanol as conditioning solvent, 10mL of sample solution at pH 2, extraction time of 30min, stirring speed of 600rpm, 100L of isopropanol as desorption solvent, desorption time of 5min under ultrasonication, and 0.4% w/v of composite film. Under the optimized conditions, the calibration curve showed good linearity in the range of 1-500ng/mL (r(2)=0.997-0.999), and good limits of detection (0.89-8.05ng/mL) were obtained with good relative standard deviations of <4.59% (n=3) for the determination of naproxen, diclofenac sodium salt, and mefenamic acid drugs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据