4.4 Article

A multiple criteria hesitant fuzzy decision making with Shapley value-based VIKOR method

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 1065-1075

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/IFS-130798

关键词

Multiple criteria decision making problem; Hesitant fuzzy set; Shapley Value; L-p - metric; VIKOR method; TOPSIS method

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61174149]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hesitancy is the most common problem in decision making, for which hesitant fuzzy set can be considered as a suitable means allowing several possible degrees for an element to a set. And, the VIKOR method is an effective tool to determine a compromise solution by providing a maximum group utility for the majority and a minimum individual regret for the opponent in decision making, particularly in a situation where the decision maker is not able or does not know to express his/her preference. In many practical situations, the inter-dependent or interactive characteristics among criteria and preference of decision makers should be taken into account, we generally utilize the Choquet integral to depict the correlations and interactions in the decision process. When the Choquet integral is used to solve the correlative decision making problems, we ignore the importance of the ordered position of the element. In fact, each element has the same probability to be drawn and all permutations have the same probability. In this paper, we introduce the Shapley value to solve correlative problem, which is used to be interpreted as a kind of average value of the contribution of an element alone in all coalitions with the same position probability. Firstly, we present some concepts of hesitant fuzzy set and define the Shapley value-based L-p - metric (SLp,mu - metric). With the SLp,mu - metric, an extended VIKOR method is developed to deal with the correlative multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) problem under hesitant fuzzy environment. To comparative analysis, we also apply the TOPSIS method to solve the problem based on the Shapley value. Finally, a comparative analysis of the two methods is illustrated with a numerical example.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据