4.3 Article

Are ecstasy induced serotonergic alterations overestimated for the majority of users?

期刊

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 32, 期 7, 页码 741-748

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0269881118767646

关键词

Ecstasy; MDMA; epidemiology; drug policy

资金

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/F500386/1, BB/F529254/1]
  2. UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)
  3. UK Medical Research Council (MRC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Neuroimaging studies imply that the regular use of +/- 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), the major constituent of ecstasy pills, alters the brain's serotonergic system in a dose-dependent manner. However, the relevance of these findings remains unclear due to limited knowledge about the ecstasy/MDMA use pattern of real-life users. Aims: We examined the representativeness of ecstasy users enrolled in neuroimaging studies by comparing their ecstasy use habits with the use patterns of a large, international sample. Methods: A systematic literature search revealed 10 imaging studies that compare serotonin transporter levels in recreational ecstasy users to matched controls. To characterize the ecstasy use patterns we relied on the Global Drug Survey, the world's largest self-report database on drug use. The basis of the dose comparison were the Usual Amount (pills/session), Use Frequency (sessions/month) and Dose Intensity (pills/year) variables. Results: Both the average Usual Amount (pills/session) and Use Frequency (sessions/month) of neuroimaging study participants corresponded to the top 5-10% of the Global Drug Survey sample and imaging participants, on average, consumed 720% more pills over a year than the Global Drug Survey participants. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the serotonin brain imaging literature has focused on unusually heavy ecstasy use and therefore the conclusions from these studies are likely to overestimate the extent of serotonergic alterations experienced by the majority of people who use ecstays.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据