4.3 Review

Are cannabis-using and non-using patients different groups? Towards understanding the neurobiology of cannabis use in psychotic disorders

期刊

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 32, 期 8, 页码 825-849

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0269881118760662

关键词

Cannabis; psychosis; schizophrenia; MRI; endocannabinoid

资金

  1. MRC [MR/P001408/1, MC_PC_14105] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [MR/P001408/1, MC_PC_14105] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Department of Health [NIHR-CS-011-001] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A substantial body of credible evidence has accumulated that suggest that cannabis use is an important potentially preventable risk factor for the development of psychotic illness and its worse prognosis following the onset of psychosis. Here we summarize the relevant evidence to argue that the time has come to investigate the neurobiological effects of cannabis in patients with psychotic disorders. In the first section we summarize evidence from longitudinal studies that controlled for a range of potential confounders of the association of cannabis use with increased risk of developing psychotic disorders, increased risk of hospitalization, frequent and longer hospital stays, and failure of treatment with medications for psychosis in those with established illness. Although some evidence has emerged that cannabis-using and non-using patients with psychotic disorders may have distinct patterns of neurocognitive and neurodevelopmental impairments, the biological underpinnings of the effects of cannabis remain to be fully elucidated. In the second and third sections we undertake a systematic review of 70 studies, including over 3000 patients with psychotic disorders or at increased risk of psychotic disorder, in order to delineate potential neurobiological and neurochemical mechanisms that may underlie the effects of cannabis in psychotic disorders and suggest avenues for future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据