4.6 Article

The imbalanced anterior and posterior default mode network in the primary insomnia

期刊

JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 103, 期 -, 页码 97-103

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.05.013

关键词

Primary insomnia; Functional connectivity density; Resting state magnetic resonance imaging; Default mode network

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81303057, 81503670, 81603682, 81373560]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neuroimaging studies have demonstrated that the brain is altered both structurally and functionally in patients with primary insomnia (PI). However, most previous hypothesis-driven studies of PI might bias observations. Here, we use global functional connectivity density (gFCD), a hypothesis-free approach, to investigate the brain functional alteration in patients with PI. Forty-eight patients with PI and 51 matched healthy control (HC) subjects were recruited and underwent a resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scan. Analyses of group differences of gFCD in the whole brain and the clinical significances of abnormal brain function were conducted, Compared with the HC group, patients with PI showed increased gFCD in the executive control network, salience network, dorsal attention network, and visual network. Interestingly, the gFCD in the anterior default mode network (DMN) is increased in the PI group, whereas the gFCD in the posterior DMN is decreased. In addition, the increased gFCD in the insula is associated with higher Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores in the PI group. The gender and duration of disease have no significant effects on abnormal gFCD network. This study is the first attempt to explore the gFCD feature in patients with PI. Our findings support the hyper arousal model of insomnia and suggest an imbalanced neural spontaneous fluctuation between anterior and posterior DMN in the resting state in patients with PI. These findings expand our understanding of the neuropathological mechanism of primary insomnia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据