4.8 Article

A highly efficient autothermal microchannel reactor for ammonia decomposition: Analysis of hydrogen production in transient and steady-state regimes

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 386, 期 -, 页码 47-55

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.03.043

关键词

Ammonia decomposition; Ammonia oxidation; Autothermal reactor design; Microchannel reactor; Hydrogen generation; Fuel cell

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST) HySA Infrastructure Centre of Competence [KP5 program]
  2. Department of Science and Technology (DST) HySA Infrastructure Centre of Competence [NRF] [85309]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The experimental evaluation of an autothermal microchannel reactor for H-2 production from NH3 decomposition is described. The reactor design incorporates an autothermal approach, with added NH3 oxidation, for coupled heat supply to the endothermic decomposition reaction. An alternating catalytic plate arrangement is used to accomplish this thermal coupling in a cocurrent flow strategy. Detailed analysis of the transient operating regime associated with reactor start-up and steady-state results is presented. The effects of operating parameters on reactor performance are investigated, specifically, the NH3 decomposition flow rate, NH3 oxidation flow rate, and fuel-oxygen equivalence ratio. Overall, the reactor exhibits rapid response time during start-up; within 60 min, H-2 production is approximately 95% of steady-state values. The recommended operating point for steady-state H-2 production corresponds to an NH3 decomposition flow rate of 6 NL min(-1), NH3 oxidation flow rate of 4 NL min(-1), and fuel-oxygen equivalence ratio of 1.4. Under these flows, NH3 conversion of 99.8% and H-2 equivalent fuel cell power output of 0.71 kW(e), is achieved. The reactor shows good heat utilization with a thermal efficiency of 75.9%. An efficient autothermal reactor design is therefore demonstrated, which may be upscaled to a multi-kW H-2 production system for commercial implementation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据