4.8 Article

A combined theoretical-experimental study of interactions between vanadium ions and Nafion membrane in all-vanadium redox flow batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 373, 期 -, 页码 150-160

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.10.050

关键词

Nafion; Vanadium redox flow batteries; ab-initio calculations; Infrared spectroscopy

资金

  1. Nebraska Center for Energy Sciences Research at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln
  2. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. Corning Foundation
  5. Corning Faculty Fellowship in Materials Science and Engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFBs) are a promising solution for large-scale energy storage, but a number of problems still impede the deployment of long-lifetime VRFBs. One important aspect of efficient operation of VRFBs is understanding interactions between vanadium species and the membrane. Herein, we investigate the interactions between all four vanadium cations and Nafion membrane by a combination of infrared (IR) spectroscopy and density-functional-theory (DFT)-based static and molecular dynamics simulations. It is observed that vanadium species primarily lead to changes in the IR spectrum of Nafion in the SOT spectral region which is attributed to the interaction between vanadium species and the SOT exchange sites. DFT calculations of vanadium Nafion complexes in the gas phase show that it is thermodynamically favorable for all vanadium cations to bind to SOT via a contact pair mechanism. Car-Parrinello molecular dynamics -based metadynamics simulations of cation-Nafion systems in aqueous solution suggest that V2+ and V3+ species coordinate spontaneously to SOT, which is not the case for VO2+ and VOI. The interaction behavior of the uncycled membrane determined in this study is used to explain the experimentally observed changes in the vibrational spectra, and is discussed in light of previous results on device-cycled membranes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据