4.7 Article

Comparing aryltetralin lignan accumulation patterns in four biotechnological systems of Linum album

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 228, 期 -, 页码 197-207

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2018.06.006

关键词

Podophyllotoxin; Methoxypodophyllotoxin; Cell suspension culture; Coronatine; Hairy roots; Linum album

资金

  1. Spanish MINECO [BIO2017-82374-R]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain [2017SGR242]
  3. SENESCYT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Linum album is a herbaceous plant with medical interest due to its content of podophyllotoxin (PTOX), an aryltetralin lignan with cytotoxic activity. Previous studies in our laboratory showed that cell suspension cultures of L. album produced more PTOX than methoxypodophyllotoxin (6-MPTOX), both lignans being formed from the same precursor after divergence close to the end of the biosynthetic pathway. In contrast, the hairy roots produced more 6-MPTOX than PTOX. Taking into account this variability, we were interested to know if the lignan profile of an in vitro PTOX-producing L. album plant changes according to the biotechnological system employed and, if so, if this is due to cell dedifferentiation and/or transformation events. With this aim, we established four biotechnological systems: (1) Wild type cell suspensions, (2) transformed cell suspensions, (3) adventitious roots and (4) hairy roots. We determined the production of four aryltetralin lignans: PTOX, 6-MPTOX, deoxypodophyllotoxin (dPTOX) and beta-peltatin. The results show that in vitro plantlets, WT cells and transformed cells predominantly produced PTOX, production being 11-fold higher in the plantlets. Otherwise, the adventitious and hairy roots predominantly produced 6-MPTOX, the adventitious roots being the most productive, with MPTOX levels 1.58-fold higher than in transformed roots. We can infer from these results that in the studied plants, cell differentiation promoted the formation of 6-MPTOX over PTOX, while transformation did not influence the lignan pattern.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据