4.7 Article

In vivo cytological and chemical analysis of Casparian strips using stimulated Raman scattering microscopy

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 220, 期 -, 页码 136-144

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2017.11.002

关键词

Casparian strip; Lignin; Suberin; Label-free analysis; Stimulated Raman scattering microscopy; Maize

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFD0600201]
  2. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (111 project) [B13007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Casparian strip, a barrier to the apoplastic movement of solutes from the cortex to the stele, is essential for the exclusion of salts, selective nutrient uptake, and many other processes. To date, extensive studies have focused on the physiological functions of endodermal Casparian strips. However, the chemical deposition nature of Casparian strips, as well as its relevance with respect to diffusion barrier functions, remains to be further elucidated. Here, we revealed three developmental stages of Casparian strips in maize primary roots using a traditional fluorescent staining method. Apoplastic permeability tests demonstrated that the barrier function of Casparian strips is largely related to their developmental stage and the pattern of lignin and suberin deposits. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis showed that the Casparian strips from the roots exhibited significant absorption bands characteristic of lignin and suberin, implying that the Casparian strips in maize primary roots consist largely of lignin and suberin. Furthermore, we developed a new method for label-free, in vivo structural, and biochemical analysis of Casparian strips based on stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy. Using SRS microscopy, we found that lignin and suberin accumulate simultaneously during the Casparian strip formation process. Based on these results, we propose a potential application of SRS for the chemical composition analysis of plant Casparian strips in situ.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据