4.6 Review

The impact of exercise and nutrition on the regulation of skeletal muscle mass

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 597, 期 5, 页码 1251-1258

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/JP275443

关键词

Food; Supplement; Omega-3; Proteome; Exercise

资金

  1. Diabetes Canada Fellowship award
  2. Labarge Mobility Scholarship
  3. National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. Canadian Institutes for Health Research
  5. Canada Research Chairs program
  6. NIH [DK115400, DK56341, UL1 TR000448]
  7. American Diabetes Association [ICTS 1-18-ICTS-119]
  8. Atkins Obesity Award
  9. MRC [MR/K00414X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The maintenance of skeletal muscle mass and strength throughout life is a key determinant of human health and well-being. There is a gradual loss of both skeletal muscle mass and strength with ageing (a process termed sarcopenia) that increases the risk of functional dependence, morbidity and mortality. Understanding the factors that regulate the size of human muscle mass, particularly during the later years of life, has therefore become an area of intense scientific inquiry. The amount of muscle mass is determined by coordinated changes in muscle protein synthesis (MPS) and muscle protein breakdown (MPB). In this review, we assess both classical and contemporary work that has examined how resistance exercise and nutrition impact on MPS and MPB. Special consideration is given to the role of different sources of dietary protein (food vs. supplements) and non-protein nutrients such as omega-3 fatty acids in regulating MPS. We also critically evaluate recent studies that have employed novel 'omic' technologies such as dynamic protein profiling to probe for changes in rates of MPS and MPB at the individual protein level following exercise. Finally, we provide suggestions for future research that we hope will yield important information for the development of exercise and nutritional strategies to counteract muscle loss in a variety of clinical settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据