4.6 Article

Breathing regulation and blood gas homeostasis after near complete lesions of the retrotrapezoid nucleus in adult rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 596, 期 13, 页码 2521-2545

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/JP275866

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL074011, HL28785]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The retrotrapezoid nucleus (RTN) is one of several CNS nuclei that contribute, in various capacities (e.g. CO2 detection, neuronal modulation) to the central respiratory chemoreflex (CRC). Here we test how important the RTN is to PCO2 homeostasis and breathing during sleep or wake. RTN Nmb-positive neurons were killed with targeted microinjections of substance P-saporin conjugate in adult rats. Under normoxia, rats with large RTN lesions (92 +/- 4% cell loss) had normal blood pressure and arterial pH but were hypoxic (-8 mmHg PaO2) and hypercapnic (+10 mmHg ). In resting conditions, minute volume (V-E) was normal but breathing frequency (f(R)) was elevated and tidal volume (V-T) reduced. Resting O-2 consumption and CO2 production were normal. The hypercapnic ventilatory reflex in 65% FiO(2) had an inverse exponential relationship with the number of surviving RTN neurons and was decreased by up to 92%. The hypoxic ventilatory reflex (HVR; FiO(2) 21-10%) persisted after RTN lesions, hypoxia-induced sighing was normal and hypoxia-induced hypotension was reduced. In rats with RTN lesions, breathing was lowest during slow-wave sleep, especially under hyperoxia, but apnoeas and sleep-disordered breathing were not observed. In conclusion, near complete RTN destruction in rats virtually eliminates the CRC but the HVR persists and sighing and the state dependence of breathing are unchanged. Under normoxia, RTN lesions cause no change in V-E but alveolar ventilation is reduced by at least 21%, probably because of increased physiological dead volume. RTN lesions do not cause sleep apnoea during slow-wave sleep, even under hyperoxia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据