4.2 Article

Activated Platelets Induce Estrogen Receptor β Expression in Endometriotic Stromal Cells

期刊

GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION
卷 80, 期 3, 页码 187-192

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000377629

关键词

Endometriosis; Estrogen receptor beta; Gene expression; Platelet; Therapeutic target

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [81270676, 81471434, 81070470, 81370695, 81401183]
  2. Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Health [2013ZYJB0019]
  3. Ministry of Health, PR China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: Endometriosis is viewed first and foremost as an estrogen-dependent disease, featuring not only excessive estrogen production but also aberrant expression of estrogen receptors (ERs), particularly ER beta, that mediate the estrogen action. ER beta is the predominant ER in mediating estrogen action in endometriosis, and estrogen plays a vital role in the development of endometriosis; thus, ER beta is viewed as a strong candidate for therapeutic targeting. Given our recent finding that platelets aggregate in endonnetriotic lesions, we sought to investigate whether activated platelets can upregulate ER beta. Methods: Using primary endometriotic stromal cells derived from patients with ovarian endometriomas and platelets harvested from healthy donors, we performed real-time RT-PCR analysis of mRNA abundance (n = 8) and Western blot analysis of protein expression (n = 8) of ER alpha and ER beta when co-cultured with phosphate-buffered saline, platelets, thrombin alone, and platelets plus thrombin for 48 h. Results: Treatment of endometriotic stronnal cells with activated platelets resulted in the upregulation of ER beta gene and protein expression. Conclusion: In the presence of aggregated and thus activated platelets in endometriotic lesions, ER beta, but not ER alpha, is up-regulated in endometriotic stromal cells. Our result suggests that the use of antiplatelet therapy may have potential in the treatment of endometriosis. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据