4.6 Review

Research Priority Setting in Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
卷 65, 期 5, 页码 674-683

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.11.011

关键词

Chronic kidney disease (CKD); kidney disease; renal failure; dialysis; acute kidney injury (AKI); epidemiology and outcomes; research priorities; priority setting; research agenda; patient-centered research; funding body strategy

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council Fellowship [1037162]
  2. Alberta Innovates [201300672] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Resources for research are insufficient to cover all unanswered questions, and therefore difficult choices about allocation must be made. Recently there has been a move toward more patient-centered research. This study aims to evaluate approaches to research prioritization in kidney disease and describe research priorities of patients with kidney disease, their caregivers, the health care providers involved in their care, and policy makers. Study Design: Systematic review. Setting & Population: Studies that elicited patient, caregiver, health care provider, or policy maker priorities for research in kidney disease were included. Search Strategy & Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were searched to May 2014. Analytical Approach: Descriptive synthesis. Results: We identified 16 studies (n = 2,365 participants) conducted in the United States, the Netherlands, Australia, Canada, and internationally. Only 4 (25%) studies explicitly involved patients. Various priority-setting methods were used, including the Delphi technique, expert panels, consensus conference, ranking or voting surveys, focus groups, and interviews, of which the process was described in detail by 11 (69%) studies. The priority areas for research most frequently identified across studies were prevention of acute kidney injury, prevention of chronic kidney disease progression, fluid and diet restrictions, improving vascular access, kidney transplant survival, access to transplantation, patient education, and psychosocial impact of chronic kidney disease. Limitations: Most studies were conducted in high-income countries. Conclusions: The priorities identified by kidney disease research priority-setting exercises are broad ranging, but patient involvement is uncommon and the processes often are incompletely described. Establishing research priorities using a prespecified and transparent process that engages patients, caregivers, and health care providers is needed to ensure that resources are invested to answer questions that address the shared priorities in kidney disease. (C) 2015 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据