Plural self-awareness

It has been claimed in the literature that collective intentionality and group attitudes presuppose some sense of 'us' among the participants (other labels sometimes used are sense of community, communal awareness, shared point of view, or we-perspective). While this seems plausible enough on an intuitive level, little attention has been paid so far to the question of what the nature and role of this mysterious sense of 'us' might be. This paper states (and argues for) the following five claims: (1) it is neither the case that the sense in question has the community (or us) in its content or as its object nor does the attitude in question presuppose a preexistent community (or us) as its subject. (2) The sense of 'us' is plural pre-reflective self-awareness. (3) Plural pre-reflective self-awareness plays the same role in the constitution of a common mind that singular pre-reflective self-awareness plays in the individual mind. (4) The most important conceptions of plural subjects, collective persons, or group agents in the current literature fail to recognize the nature and role of plural self-awareness, and therefore fall short in important respects. (5) In spite of the striking similarities between the plural and the singular mind, there are important differences to consider. The authority of the singular first person point of view has no equivalent in the plural case.