期刊
HEALTHCARE-THE JOURNAL OF DELIVERY SCIENCE AND INNOVATION
卷 2, 期 1, 页码 53-62出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2013.11.003
关键词
Cancer care; Quality measurement; Patient-centeredness; Learning health care system; Public reporting; Health care delivery
资金
- AARP
- American Cancer Society
- American College of Surgeons' Commissionon Cancer
- American Society for Radiation Oncology
- American Society of Clinical Oncology
- American Society of Hematology
- California Health Care Foundation
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- LIVESTRONG
- National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship
- Oncology Nursing Society
- Susan G. Komen for the Cure
- National Cancer Institute
In 1999, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) published Ensuring Quality Cancer Care, an influential report that described an ideal cancer care system and issued ten recommendations to address pervasive gaps in the understanding and delivery of quality cancer care. Despite generating much fervor, the report's recommendations-including two recommendations related to quality measurement-remain largely unfulfilled. Amidst continuing concerns regarding increasing costs and questionable quality of care, the IOM charged a new committee with revisiting the 1999 report and with reassessing national cancer care, with a focus on the aging US population. The committee identified high-quality patient-clinician relationships and interactions as central drivers of quality and attributed existing quality gaps, in part, to the nation's inability to measure and improve cancer care delivery in a systematic way. In 2013, the committee published its findings in Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: Charting a New Course for a System in Crisis, which included two recommendations that emphasize coordinated, patient-centered quality measurement and information technology enhancements: Develop a national quality reporting program for cancer care as part of a learning health care system; and Develop an ethically sound learning health care information technology system for cancer that enables real-time analysis of data from cancer patients in a variety of care settings. These recommendations underscore the need for independent national oversight, public-private collaboration, and substantial funding to create robust, patient-centered quality measurement and learning enterprises to improve the quality, accessibility, and affordability of cancer care in America. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据