4.1 Article

Attention bias for chocolate increases chocolate consumption - An attention bias modification study

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.09.009

关键词

Attention bias; Attention modification; Chocolate; Antisaccade task; Eye-tracking; Overeating

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The current study examined experimentally whether a manipulated attention bias for food cues increases craving, chocolate intake and motivation to search for hidden chocolates. Method: To test the effect of attention for food on subsequent chocolate intake, attention for chocolate was experimentally modified by instructing participants to look at chocolate stimuli (attend chocolate group) or at non-food stimuli (attend shoes group) during a novel attention bias modification task (antisaccade task). Chocolate consumption, changes in craving and search time for hidden chocolates were assessed. Eye-movement recordings were used to monitor the accuracy during the experimental attention modification task as possible moderator of effects. Regression analyses were conducted to test the effect of attention modification and modification accuracy on chocolate intake, craving and motivation to search for hidden chocolates. Results: Results showed that participants with higher accuracy (+1 SD), ate more chocolate when they had to attend to chocolate and ate less chocolate when they had to attend to non-food stimuli. In contrast, for participants with lower accuracy (-1 SD), the results were exactly reversed. No effects of the experimental attention modification on craving or search time for hidden chocolates were found. Limitation: We used chocolate as food stimuli so it remains unclear how our findings generalize to other types of food. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate further evidence for a link between attention for food and food intake, and provide an indication about the direction of this relationship. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据