4.4 Article

The optimal rounding

期刊

MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING COMPUTATION
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 33-54

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12532-013-0060-9

关键词

Mixed integer programming; Mixed integer nonlinear programming; Primal heuristic; Large neighborhood search; Rounding

资金

  1. DFG Research Center Matheon Mathematics for key technologies in Berlin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces RENS, the relaxation enforced neighborhood search, a large neighborhood search algorithm for mixed integer nonlinear programs (MINLPs). It uses a sub-MINLP to explore the set of feasible roundings of an optimal solution x of a linear or nonlinear relaxation. The sub-MINLP is constructed by fixing integer variables x(j) with (x) over bar (j) is an element of Z and bounding the remaining integer variables to xj. {[(x) over bar (j)], [(x) over bar (j)]}. We describe two different applications of RENS: as a stand-alone algorithm to compute an optimal rounding of the given starting solution and as a primal heuristic inside a complete MINLP solver. We use the former to compare different kinds of relaxations and the impact of cutting planes on the so-called round-ability of the corresponding optimal solutions. We further utilize RENS to analyze the performance of three rounding heuristics implemented in the branch-cut-and-price framework SCIP. Finally, we study the impact of RENS when it is applied as a primal heuristic inside SCIP. All experiments were performed on three publicly available test sets of mixed integer linear programs (MIPs), mixed integer quadratically constrained programs (MIQCPs), and MINLPs, using solely software which is available in source code. It turns out that for these problem classes 60 to 70% of the instances have roundable relaxation optima and that the success rate of RENS does not depend on the percentage of fractional variables. Last but not least, rens applied as primal heuristic complements nicely with existing primal heuristics in SCIP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据