4.2 Article

Mixed micellization study of dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide mixture in aqueous/urea medium at different temperatures: Theoretical and experimental view

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/poc.3872

关键词

activity coefficient; critical micelle concentration (cmc); interaction parameter; micellar mole fraction; mixed micellization; thermodynamic parameter

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of Peoples Republic of Bangladesh

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The behavior of mixed micelle formation between two cationic surfactants-dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride (DTAC) and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) in absence/attendance of urea has been investigated by means of conductivity measurements over temperature range of 298.15 to 318.15 K. Lower magnitudes of the critical micelle concentration from their ideal values imply the strong interaction between the studied amphiphiles. The micellar mole fraction (X-1) on the basis of the different proposed model (Rubingh, Motomura & Rodenas) and the ideal micellar mole fraction (X-id) were evaluated, and estimated results imply the high contribution of CTAB in the mixed micelle formation that enhances with the augment of the mole fraction of the CTAB. The values of activity coefficients (f(1) and f(2)) (less than unity) and negative values of the interaction parameter (beta) in all cases signify the attractive interaction between the amphiphiles studied. Spontaneous mixed micelle formation between the studied amphiphiles (dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride and CTAB) was indicated by the negative magnitudes of free energy of micellization (Delta G(m)(0)). The negative values of excess free energy of micellization (Delta G(ex)) indicate the higher stability of the mixed micelle compared with the single micelle. The standard enthalpy change of micellization (Delta H-m(0)) and standard entropy change of micellization (Delta S-m(0)) were also calculated and discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据