4.6 Article

Electron Transfer from Photoexcited Naphthalene Diimide Radical Anion to Electrocatalytically Active Re(bpy)(CO)3Cl in a Molecular Triad

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 122, 期 5, 页码 2608-2617

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b11999

关键词

-

资金

  1. Argonne Northwestern Solar Energy Research (ANSER) Center, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001059]
  2. Qatar National Research Fund (Qatar Foundation) [9-174-2-092]
  3. Soft and Hybrid Nanotechnology Experimental (SHyNE) Resource [NSF NNCI-1542205]
  4. State of Illinois
  5. International Institute for Nanotechnology (IIN)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electron donor-acceptor photosensitizers having long charge separation lifetimes and high-reducing potentials that can be easily appended to thermodynamically difficult to reduce catalysts hold great promise for driving CO2 reduction. This study presents a new molecular triad utilizing a naphthalene diimide radical anion (NDI center dot-) donor chromophore appended to a 9,10-diphenylanthracene (DPA) acceptor, which is in turn linked to Re(bpy)(CO)(3)Cl. The NDI center dot- chromophore is readily generated by mild chemical or electrochemical reduction, absorbs at wavelengths as long as 800 nm, and has an excited state oxidation potential (-2.1 V vs SCE), which rivals or exceeds those of metalorganic and organometallic chromophores. Photoexcitation of NDI center dot- to *NDI center dot- is followed by ultrafast reduction of DPA to DPA(center dot-), which then rapidly reduces the metal complex. The overall quantum yield for reduction of Re(bpy)(CO)(3)Cl is approximately 90% using visible light. The overall time constant for the forward electron transfer to reduce the metal complex is tau = 14.5 ps, while the time constant for back-electron transfer is tau = 24.5 ns. Under typical electrocatalytic conditions, the molecular triad demonstrates electrochemical reduction of CO2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据