4.6 Article

Excellent Microwave Absorbing Property of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes with Skin-Core Heterostructure Formed by Outer Dominated Fluorination

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 122, 期 11, 页码 6357-6367

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10819

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51633004, 51573105]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering [sklpme2017-2-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is attractive that excellent microwave absorbing materials with novel structure are prepared. In this work, we present a novel skin-core strctured fluorinated multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) microwave absorbing material through selective fluorination of the outer shell of MWCNTs. Fluorine gas (F-2) can attack defect sites to form CF2 at defect sites at low temperature. The preformed CF2 bond can prevent the permeation of F-2 into inner tubes, bringing about the mere fluorination of the outer skin with inner tubes intact at high temperature (the sample is denoted as F-h-MWCNTs). As a result, composed of an outer insulating skin and inner conductive tubes, F-h-MWCNTs behave as a skin-core heterostructure and show excellent microwave absorbing property with minimal reflection loss up to -69 dB at a thickness of 1.5 mm when the filler loading is only 9.1 wt %. Based on the investigation of electromagnetic behavior of a fluorinated single -walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT), the strong microwave absorption capacity of F-h-MWCNTs was attributed to the skin-core heterostructure. The outer skin is a fluorinated layer behaving with good impedance matching, which is conducive to the transmission of electromagnetic waves. The inner tubes maintain intact after direct heating fluorination and show a strong ability of attenuating electromagnetic waves. Meanwhile, F-h-MWCNTs possess better dispersibility in epoxy, making F-h-MWCNTs a proper candidate to prepare advanced an composite with strong absorption and good mechanical property.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据