4.6 Article

Hindered Diffusion in Ordered Mesoporous Silicas: Insights from Pore-Scale Simulations in Physical Reconstructions of SBA-15 and KIT-6 Silica

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 122, 期 23, 页码 12350-12361

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b03630

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG (Bonn, Germany) [TA 268/9-1]
  2. Karlsruhe Nano Micro Facility (KNMF) at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (Karlsruhe, Germany) under KNMF long-term [2017-019-020749]
  3. University of Vienna (Austria)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performance of SBA-15 and KIT-6 silicas as ordered mesoporous supports for heterogeneous catalysis, selective adsorption, and controlled drug release relies on their properties for diffusive transport of finite-size solutes or particles. We investigate this issue through a reconstruction-simulation approach, applied to purely mesoporous SBA-15 and KIT-6 silica samples with a mean pore size of 9.4 nm. Physical reconstruction by electron tomography confirms a highly interconnected, three-dimensional mesopore network for both samples but also reveals constrictions (both samples) and dead ends (SBA-15 only) in the supposedly uniform cylinders of the primary pore system. Pore-scale simulations of the diffusion of pointlike and finite-size tracers in the reconstructions show that a small number of bottlenecks suffices for observing a dramatic decline in the effective diffusion coefficient, accessible porosity, and pore interconnectivity with increasing tracer size. When the tracer size approaches one-third of the mean pore size, diffusive transport becomes impossible. Below this limit, KIT-6 performs better than SBA-15 but both samples are decidedly inferior to random mesoporous silicas. Our results suggest that diffusive transport in SBA-15 and KIT-6 silicas could be improved by widening intrawall pores toward the mean pore size to provide bypasses around bottlenecks in the primary pore system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据