4.6 Article

Role of Donor and Acceptor Substituents on the Nonlinear Optical Properties of Gold Nanoclusters

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 122, 期 7, 页码 4019-4028

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b12356

关键词

-

资金

  1. KU Leuven
  2. Funds for Scientific Research-Flanders (FWO) [G0A1817N]
  3. CSC-The IT Center for Science (Espoo/Finland) [INT2605]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, a large number of monolayer-protected clusters (MPCs) have been studied by means of single crystal structure characterization. A central aspect of research on MPCs is the correlation of their interesting optical properties with structural features and the formulation of a theoretical framework that allows interpretation of their unique properties. For this, superatom and jellium models have been proven successful. Little attention, however, has been paid to the influence of the protecting ligands. Here, we investigate the effect of changes in [Au-25(SR)(18-x)(SR')(x)](-), where SR' represents a para-substituted thiophenolate derivative (SPh-4-X). We computed the first hyperpolarizabilities, screening a broad range of substituents X. For [Au-25(SR)(17)(SR')(1)](-) clusters, significant first hyperpolarizabilities were calculated, spanning 2 orders of magnitude depending on X. A strong dependence on the electron-donating/withdrawing properties of the substituent was found for para-substituted thiophenol ligands. Protonation of amine substituents leads to a change from donor to acceptor substitution, leading to a record setting contrast for nonlinear optical proton sensing. Furthermore, push/pull systems were considered where both an acceptor and a donor ligand were positioned at opposite ends of the cluster. This induces significant increase of the first hyperpolarizability through charge transfer. Overall, our results indicate that the right choice of ligand can significantly impact the (nonlinear) optical properties of MPCs. This adds a new component to the cluster chemist's toolbox.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据