4.5 Article

Molecular Mechanism of Loading Sulfur Hexafluoride in gamma-Cyclodextrin Metal-Organic Framework

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 122, 期 20, 页码 5225-5233

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b01420

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Projects for the Major New Drugs Innovation and Development [2017ZX09101001]
  2. Intergovernmental Key International Scientific and Technological Innovation Cooperation [2016YFE0125100]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81773645]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

gamma-Cyclodextrin metal-organic framework (gamma-CD-MOF) is a new type of highly porous carrier for potential loading of therapeutic or diagnostic gas like sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). Here, loading of SF6 into gamma-CD-MOF was investigated for its mechanism by molecular simulation and quantitative determination of SF6 using quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (qNMR). For the SF6 loading, gamma-CD-MOF was first degassed to remove the air without thermal decomposition or loss of framework crystallinity, then placed in the copper tube, and sealed to adsorb SF6 under 1.2 MPa and 25 degrees C for 12 h. The qNMR was employed for the determination of SF6 loaded in gamma-CD-MOF using Span 80 as suspending agent and trifluoroacetic acid as internal standard. Then, the thermodynamic parameters had been estimated. Finally, molecular modeling combining with F-19 NMR spectra was conducted to reveal the status of SF6 molecules in gamma-CD-MOF. The results demonstrated that the content of SF6 loaded in gamma-CD-MOF was 2.67 +/- 0.46 wt %. After exposing to the environment of free SF6 at 0.1 MPa for 10 days, the relative content was 74.7%. It was confirmed that SF6 preferred to stay in the cavity of gamma-CD-MOF cubes rather than in the gamma-CD molecular pairs, which was a nonchemical adsorptive process. In conclusion, this research has established qNMR method and molecular simulation to demonstrate SF6 molecules in gamma-CD-MOF and its loading mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据