4.5 Article

Binding Specificity Determines the Cytochrome P450 3A4 Mediated Enantioselective Metabolism of Metconazole

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 122, 期 3, 页码 1176-1184

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b11170

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21477113, 21427815, 21621005]
  2. Major Research Plan of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [91643107]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. IBM Blue Gene Science Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) is a promiscuous enzyme, mediating the biotransformations of similar to 50% of clinically used drugs, many of which are chiral molecules. Probing the interactions between CYP3A4 and chiral chemicals is thus essential for the elucidation of molecular mechanisms of enantioselective metabolism. We developed a stepwise-restrained-molecular-dynamics (MD) method to model human CYP3A4 in a complex with cis-metconazole (MEZ) isomers and performed conventional MD simulations with a total simulation time of 2.2 mu s to probe the molecular interactions. Our current study, which employs a combined experimental and theoretical approach, reports for the first time on the distinct conformational changes of CYP3A4 that are induced by the enantioselective binding of cis-MEZ enantiomers. CYP3A4 preferably metabolizes cis-RS MEZ over the cis-SR isomer, with the resultant enantiomer fraction for cis-MEZ increasing rapidly from 0.5 to 0.82. cis-RS MEZ adopts a more extended structure in the active pocket with its Cl atom exposed to the solvent, whereas cis-SR MEZ sits within the hydrophobic core of the active pocket. Free-energy-perturbation calculations indicate that unfavorable van der Waals interactions between the cis-MEZ isomers and the CYP3A4 binding pocket predominantly contribute to their binding-affinity differences. These results demonstrate that binding specificity determines the cytochrome P450 3A4 mediated enantioselective metabolism of cis-MEZ.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据