4.0 Review

A Systematic Review of Innovative Diabetes Care Models in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs)

出版社

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2014.0037

关键词

Diabetes care models; diabetes management programs; low- and middle-income countries; developing countries; resource-poor settings; less-developed countries; diabetes mellitus; type 2 diabetes; diabetes complications; global diabetes care models; diabetes model; diabetes management

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [KL2RR025749, K23 RR023335, UL1RR025750, TL1RR025748] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [AG-18728-01A1, P01-AG021654, AG024391, AG7992, P01 AG027734] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [P60-DK20541, DK069861, DK048321] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Over 70% of the world's patients with diabetes reside in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where adequate infrastructure and resources for diabetes care are often lacking. Therefore, academic institutions, health care organizations, and governments from Western nations and LMICs have worked together to develop a variety of effective diabetes care models for resource-poor settings. Methods. A focused search of PubMed was conducted with the goal of identifying reports that addressed the implementation of diabetes care models or initiatives to improve clinical and/or biochemical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus. Results. A total of 15 published manuscripts comprising nine diabetes care models in 16 locations in sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, and Asia identified by the above approach were systematically reviewed. The reviewed models shared a number of principles including collaboration, education, standardization, resource optimization, and technological innovation. The most comprehensive models used a number of these principles, which contributed to their success. Conclusions. Reviewing the principles shared by these successful programs may help guide the development of effective future models for diabetes care in low-income settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据