4.6 Article

Effect of pterin impurities on the fluorescence and photochemistry of commercial folic acid

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.03.007

关键词

Folates; Photostability; UV-A radiation; Pterinic impurities; Photosensitization

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET) [PIP 0304]
  2. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica (ANPCyT) [PICT 2012-0508, PICT 2015-1988]
  3. Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP) [X586, X712]
  4. CONICET

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Folic acid, or pteroyl-L-glutamic acid (PteGlu) is a conjugated pterin derivative that is used in dietary supplementation as a source of folates, a group of compounds essential for a variety of physiological functions in humans. Photochemistry of PteGlu is important because folates are not synthesized by mammals, undergo photodegradation and their deficiency is related to many diseases. We have demonstrated that usual commercial PteGlu is unpurified with the unconjugated oxidized pterins 6-formylpterin (Fop) and 6-carboxypterin (Cap). These compounds are in such low amounts that a normal chromatographic control would not detect any pterinic contamination. However, the fluorescence of PteGlu solutions is due to the emission of Fop and Cap and the contribution of the PteGlu emission, much lower, is negligible. This is because the fluorescence quantum yield (Phi(F)) of PteGlu is extremely weak compared to the Phi(F) of Fop and Cap. Likewise, the PteGlu photodegradation upon UV-A radiation is an oxidation photosensitized by oxidized unconjugated pterins present in the solution, and not a process initiated by the direct absorption of photons by PteGlu. In brief, the fluorescence and photochemical properties of PteGlu solutions, prepared using commercially available solids, are due to their unconjugated pterins impurities and not to PteGlu itself. This fact calls into question many reported studies on fluorescence and photooxidation of this compound.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据