4.4 Review

Muscarinic and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists: current scenario in Alzheimer's disease therapy

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY
卷 70, 期 8, 页码 985-993

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jphp.12919

关键词

acetylcholine receptors; agonist; Alzheimer's disease; emerging drugs; therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesAlzheimer's disease (AD) has become the primary cause of dementia. It shows a progressive cognitive dysfunction with degenerating neurons. Acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) propagate the cognitive ability and it consists of two primary members namely muscarinic (mAChRs) and nicotinic receptors (nAChRs). Where mAChRs is G-protein coupled receptor, (nAChRs) are ligand-gated ion channels. The conventional therapeutic regimen for AD consists of three acetylcholinestearse inhibitors while a single NMDA receptor antagonist. Researchers around the globe are developing new and modifying the existing AChRs agonists to develop lead candidates with lower risk to benefit ratio where benefits clearly outweigh the adverse events. Key findingsWe have searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Google scholar, Science Direct and, Web of Science with keywords Muscarinic/Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, agonists and, AD. The literature search included articles written in English. Scientific relevance for clinical studies, basic science studies is eligibility criteria for articles referred in this paper. M1 is the primary muscarinic subtype while 7 is the primary nAChR subtype that is responsible for cognition and memory and these two have been the major recent experimental targets for mAChR agonist strategy. SummaryThe last cholinergic receptor agonist to enter phase 3 trial was EVP-6124 (Enceniclin) but was withdrawn due to severe gastrointestinal adverse effects. We aim to present an overview of the efforts and achievements in targeting Muscarinic and Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in the current review for development of better AD therapeutics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据