4.5 Article

Formulation of 3D Printed Tablet for Rapid Drug Release by Fused Deposition Modeling: Screening Polymers for Drug Release, Drug-Polymer Miscibility and Printability

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 107, 期 1, 页码 390-401

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2017.10.021

关键词

3D printing fused deposition modeling FDM; drug-polymer miscibility rheology; amorphous solid dispersion tablets; dissolution rate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The primary aim of this study was to identify pharmaceutically acceptable amorphous polymers for producing 3D printed tablets of a model drug, haloperidol, for rapid release by fused deposition modeling. Filaments for 3D printing were prepared by hot melt extrusion at 150 degrees C with 10% and 20% w/ w of haloperidol using Kollidon (R) VA64, Kollicoat (R) IR, Affinsiol (TM) 15 cP, and HPMCAS either individually or as binary blends (Kollidon (R) VA64 thorn Affinisol (TM) 15 cP, 1: 1; Kollidon (R) VA64 thorn HPMCAS, 1: 1). Dissolution of crushed extrudates was studied at pH 2 and 6.8, and formulations demonstrating rapid dissolution rates were then analyzed for drug-polymer, polymer-polymer and drug-polymer-polymer miscibility by film casting. Polymer-polymer (1: 1) and drug-polymer-polymer (1: 5: 5 and 2: 5: 5) mixtures were found to be miscible. Tablets with 100% and 60% infill were printed using MakerBot printer at 210 degrees C, and dissolution tests of tablets were conducted at pH 2 and 6.8. Extruded filaments of Kollidon (R) VA64-Affinisol (TM) 15 cP mixtures were flexible and had optimum mechanical strength for 3D printing. Tablets containing 10% drug with 60% and 100% infill showed complete drug release at pH 2 in 45 and 120 min, respectively. Relatively high dissolution rates were also observed at pH 6.8. The 1: 1-mixture of Kollidon (R) VA64 and Affinisol T 15 cP was thus identified as a suitable polymer system for 3D printing and rapid drug release. (c) 2018 American Pharmacists Association (R). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据