4.5 Article

Transformation of Biopharmaceutical Classification System Class I and III Drugs Into Ionic Liquids and Lipophilic Salts for Enhanced Developability Using Lipid Formulations

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 107, 期 1, 页码 203-216

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2017.05.019

关键词

lipids; salts/salt selection; solubility; self-emulsifying; formulation vehicle; oral drug delivery; Biopharmaceutics classification system; developability; zwitterion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Higher lipid solubility of lipophilic salt forms creates new product development opportunities for highdose liquid-filled capsules. The purpose of this study is to determine if lipophilic salts of Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) Class I amlodipine and BCS Class III fexofenadine, ranitidine, and metformin were better lipid formulation candidates than existing commercial salts. Lipophilic salts were prepared from lipophilic anions and commercial HCl or besylate salt forms, as verified by H-1-NMR. Thermal properties were assessed by differential scanning calorimetry and hot-stage microscopy. X-ray diffraction and polarized light microscopy were used to confirm the salt's physical form. All lipophilic salt forms were substantially more lipid-soluble (typically > 10-fold) when compared to commercial salts. For example, amlodipine concentrations in lipidic excipients were limited to < 5-10 mg/g when using the besylate salt but could be increased to > 100 mg/g when using the docusate salt. Higher lipid solubility of the lipophilic salts of each drug translated to higher drug loadings in lipid formulations. In vitro tests showed that lipophilic salts solubilized in a lipid formulation resulted in dispersion behavior that was at least as rapid as the dissolution rates of conventional salts. This study confirmed the applicability of forming lipophilic salts of BCS I and III drugs to promote the utility of lipid-based delivery systems. (c) 2018 American Pharmacists Association (R). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据