4.6 Article

Protective effects of Polygonum multiflorum on ischemic stroke rat model analysed by 1H NMR metabolic profiling

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2018.03.049

关键词

Polygonum mulhfiorum; Cerebral ischemia reperfusion; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Correlation network; Metabolic pathway analysis

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [81773857, 81673430]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stroke is the third most common cause of death in most industrialized countries. Polygonum multiflorum (He-Shou-Wu, HSW) is one of the traditional Chinese medicines with multiple pharmacological activities which is widely used in Chinese recipe. This study aims to explore the protective effect of HSW on ischemic stroke rat model and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms. The mortality rate, neurological deficit, cerebral infarct size, histopathology, immunohistochemistry, biochemical parameters, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and western blotting were used to access the treatment effects of HSW on ischemic stroke. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (H-1 NMR) based metabolomics analysis disclosed that HSW could relieve stroke rats suffering from the ischemia/reperfusion injury by ameliorating the disturbed energy and amino acids metabolisms, alleviating the oxidative stress from reactive oxygen species and reducing the inflammation. HSW treatment increased levels of cellular antioxidants that scavenged reactive oxygen species during ischemia-reperfusion via the nuclear erythroid 2-related factor 2 signaling pathway, and exert anti-inflammatory effect by decreasing the levels of inflammatory factors such as cyclooxygenase-2, interleukin-1 beta, interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. The integrated metabolomics approach showed its potential in understanding mechanisms of HSW in relieving ischemic stroke. Further study to develop HSW as an effective therapeutic agent to treat ischemic stroke is warranted. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据