4.5 Article

Generation and expulsion history of oil-source rock (Middle Jurassic Sargelu Formation) in the Kurdistan of north Iraq, Zagros folded belt: Implications from 1D basin modeling study

期刊

JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
卷 162, 期 -, 页码 852-872

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2017.11.013

关键词

Sargelu Formation; Basin modelling; Petroleum generation history; Zagros Fold Belt; North Iraq

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Middle Jurassic Sargelu Formation is an important oil-source rock in the Iraqi Kurdistan oilfields, northern Zagros Fold Belt. The Sargelu source rock is characterised by high organic matter and sulphur content with Type II-S kerogen, which can be expected to generate oil at low maturity stages. A 1D basin modelling was performed by integrating geological and geochemical data of the Sargelu source rock from six wells in the Kurdistan region, north Iraq. The basin modelling results was used to reconstruct the burial and thermal history and to simulate and predict the timing of petroleum generation and expulsion for the Middle Jurassic Sargelu source rock. Burial/thermal history models indicate that the Sargelu source rock had passed the peak-oil generation window during the Late Eocene to Late Miocene. Onset of oil-generation began during the Middle Eocene - Late Miocene (51-11 Ma), whereas the maximum rates of oil with limited gas were generated during the Late Eocene to Late Miocene (52-10 Ma). The models also show that the oil was expelled from the Sargelu source rock since Late Eocene to present-day (44-0 Ma), with transformation ratio higher than 50%. The subsequent high transformation ratio higher than 80% suggests that the generated oil was cracked to gas during the Early Oligocene and continued to present day. These basin modeling results also suggest that the Sargelu Formation acts as an effective oil-source where significant amount of petroleum is expected to be generated and expelled to any nearby prospect reservoir rocks in the Kurdistan region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据