4.5 Article

Evaluation of liquid nanofluid as fracturing fluid additive on enhanced oil recovery from low-permeability reservoirs

期刊

JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
卷 168, 期 -, 页码 390-399

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.04.073

关键词

Fracturing fluid additive; EOR; Tight oil; Wettability alteration

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Projects of China [2016ZX05051, 2017ZX05030]
  2. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting [PRP/indep-4-1703]
  3. PetroChina Innovation Foundation [2016D-5007-0205]
  4. Science Foundations of China University of Petroleum at Beijing [2462015YJRC027, 2462017YJRC031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydraulic fracturing creates a complex fracture network that makes the oil production from low-permeability reservoirs economical. However, significant amount of water is likely lost into the rock matrix during hydraulic fracturing. This can cause formation damage due to multiphase flow, thus hindering the oil production rate. Surfactants can alter rock wettability and/or reduce oil-water interfacial tension (IFT), and it has been proposed to be used to mitigate such water blockage and enhance oil recovery. Among different approaches of using surfactants, forming liquid nanofluid (LNF) can minimize the adsorption of surfactants on rock surface, and it is likely to be one of the best options for low-permeability rocks with extensive surface area. In this study, the key properties of a well-screened LNF are evaluated, and then compared with a commercial flowback surfactant (CFS) that is widely used in the field. Pressure transmission test is further applied, which can determine the change of rock permeability due to different fluids and the potential formation damage due to multiphase flow. A systematic evaluation method is thus established to screen fracturing fluid additives to enhance oil production from low-permeability reservoirs both effectively and efficiently.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据