4.6 Article

Enhancing Parent Talk, Reading, and Play in Primary Care: Sustained Impacts of the Video Interaction Project

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 199, 期 -, 页码 49-+

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.03.002

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 HD047740 01-09, R01 HD40388 01-04, 3R01HD047740-08S1]
  2. Tiger Foundation
  3. Marks Family Foundation
  4. Rhodebeck Charitable Trust
  5. Children of Bellevue, Inc
  6. KiDS of NYU Foundation, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To determine the early impacts of pediatric primary care parenting interventions on parent cognitive stimulation in low socioeconomic status families and whether these impacts are sustained up to 1.5 years after program completion. Study design This randomized controlled trial included assignment to 1 of 2 interventions (Video Interaction Project [VIP] or Building Blocks) or to a control group. Mother-newborn dyads were enrolled postpartum in an urban public hospital. In VIP, dyads met with an interventionist on days of well-child visits; the interventionist facilitated interactions in play and shared reading through provision of learning materials and review of videotaped parent-child interactions. In Building Blocks, parents were mailed parenting pamphlets and learning materials. We compare the trajectories of cognitive stimulation for parents in VIP and control from 6 to 54 months. Results There were 546 families that contributed data. VIP was associated with enhanced reading, parent verbal responsivity. and overall stimulation at all assessment points, with analyses demonstrating a 0.38 standard deviation increase in cognitive stimulation overall. Trajectory models indicated long-term persistence of VIP impacts on reading, teaching, and verbal responsivity. Conclusions VIP is associated with sustained enhancements in cognitive stimulation in the home 1.5 years after completion of the program and support expansion of pediatric interventions to enhance developmental trajectories of children of low socioeconomic status.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据