4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Growth morbidity in extremely low birth weight survivors of necrotizing enterocolitis at discharge and two-year follow-up

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
卷 53, 期 6, 页码 1197-1202

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.02.085

关键词

Necrotizing enterocolitis; Extremely low birthweight; Surgery; Growth failure; Neonatal intensive care unit; Follow-up

资金

  1. Vermont Oxford Network
  2. Boston Children's Hospital Department of Surgery Chair's Research Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine postnatal growth outcomes and predictors of growth failure at 18-24 months corrected age among extremely low birth weight (ELBW) survivors of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) compared to survivors without NEC. Methods: Data were collected prospectively on ELBW (22-27 weeks gestation or 401-1000 g birth weight) infants born 2000-2013 at 46 centers participating in the Vermont Oxford Network follow-up project. Severe growth failure was defined as <3rd percentile weight-for-age. Results: There were 9171 evaluated infants without NEC, 416 with medical NEC, and 462 with surgical NEC. Rates of severe growth failure at discharge were higher among infants with medical NEC (56%) and surgical NEC (61%), compared to those without NEC (36%). At 18-24 months follow-up, rates of severe growth failure decreased and were similar between without NEC (24%), medical NEC (24%), and surgical NEC (28%). On multivariable analysis, small for gestational age, chronic lung disease, severe intraventricular hemorrhage or cystic periventricular leukomalacia, severe growth failure at discharge, and postdischarge tube feeding predicted <3rd percentile weight-for-age at follow-up. Conclusions: ELBW survivors of NEC have higher rates of severe growth failure at discharge. While NEC is not associated with severe growth failure at follow-up, one quarter of ELBW infants have severe growth failure at 18-24 months. Type of study: Prognosis study. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据