4.1 Article

A Summary of Pediatric Palliative Care Team Structure and Services as Reported by Centers Caring for Children with Cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 452-462

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0405

关键词

pediatric cancer; pediatric oncology; pediatric palliative care

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Little is known about the composition, availability, integration, communication, perceived barriers, and work load of pediatric palliative care (PPC) providers serving children and adolescents with cancer. Objective: To summarize the structure and services of programs to better understand successes and gaps in implementing palliative care as a standard of care. Methods: Cross-sectional online survey about the palliative care domains determined by the Psychosocial Care of Children with Cancer and Their Families Workgroup. Subjects: A total of 142 surveys were completed with representation from 18 countries and 39 states. Results: Three-fourths of sites reported having a PPC program available for the pediatric cancer population at their center. Over one-fourth (28%) have been in existence less than five years. Fewer than half of sites (44%) offered 24/7 access to palliative care consultations. Neither hospital-based nor local community hospice services were available for pediatric patients at 24% of responding sites. A specific inpatient PPC unit was available at 8% of sites. Criteria for automatic palliative referrals (trigger diagnoses) were reported by 44% respondents. The presence of such triggers increased the likelihood of palliative principle introduction 3.41 times (p<0.003). Six percent of respondents perceived pediatric oncology patients and their families always were introduced to palliative care concepts and 17% reported children and families always received communication about palliative principles. The most prevalent barriers to palliative care were at the provider level. Discussion: Children and adolescents with cancer do not yet receive concurrent palliative care as a universal standard.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据