期刊
NEW ZEALAND GEOGRAPHER
卷 70, 期 1, 页码 33-46出版社
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nzg.12038
关键词
Canterbury; freshwater governance; inclusion; legitimacy; representation
类别
The question of who is included, or who is excluded, from environmental governance arrangements is at the heart of debates of institutional legitimacy. The recent redefinition of representation as a claim to speak for' another provides an opportunity to re-examine the inclusiveness of environmental governance arrangements. This article builds on these developments by empirically evaluating the inclusiveness of three representative claims embedded in freshwater governance in Canterbury since 2002. The contribution argues that accounts of environmental governance must consider implicit forms of representation that can exclude or marginalise and raises some caveats relating to expansion of network governance.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据