4.7 Article

Copper-Promoted Regioselective Synthesis of Polysubstituted Pyrroles from Aldehydes, Amines, and Nitroalkenes via 1,2-Phenyl/Alkyl Migration

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 83, 期 4, 页码 2104-2113

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.7b03051

关键词

-

资金

  1. General Secretariat for Research and Technology (GSRT)
  2. Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (HFRI) [KA 95055]
  3. IKY Fellowships of excellence for postgraduate studies in Greece-Siemens program
  4. project An Open-Access Research Infrastructure of Chemical Biology and Target-Based Screening Technologies for Human and Animal Health, Agriculture and the Environment (OPENSCREEN-GR) - Operational Programme Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovat [MIS 5002691, NSRF 2014-2020]
  5. European Union [KA94150]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The facile copper-catalyzed synthesis of polysubstituted pyrroles from aldehydes, amines, and beta-nitroalkenes is reported. Remarkably, the use of alpha-methyl-substituted aldehydes provides efficient access to a series of tetra- and pentasubstituted pyrroles via an overwhelming 1,2-phenyl/alkyl migration. The present methodology is also accessible to non alpha-substituted aldehydes, yielding the corresponding trisubstituted pyrroles. On the contrary, the use of ketones, in place of aldehydes, does not promote the organic transformation, signifying the necessity of alpha-substituted aldehydes. The reaction proceeds under mild catalytic conditions with low catalyst loading (0.3-1 mol %), a broad scope, very good functional-group tolerance, and high yields and can be easily scaled up to more than 3 mmol of product, thus highlighting a useful synthetic application of the present catalytic protocol. Based on formal kinetic studies, a possible radical pathway is proposed that involves the formation of an allylic nitrogen radical intermediate, which in turn reacts with the nitroalkene to yield the desired pyrrole framework via a radical 1,2-phenyl or alkyl migration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据