4.1 Review

Definitive Abutments Placed at Implant Insertion and Never Removed: Is It an Effective Approach? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
卷 76, 期 2, 页码 316-324

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.08.025

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To assess whether repeated abutment disconnections and reconnections have any impact on peri-implant bone resorption and soft tissue healing. Materials and Methods: Electronic and manual searches were conducted for English-language articles published up to March 2017 that identified a relation between repeated disconnections of implant abutments (PA group) and prosthetic or implant failures, complications, marginal bone loss (MBL), soft tissue healing, and esthetic evaluation (pink esthetic score [PES]) after at least 1 year of function compared with implants receiving a final abutment at the time of implant placement (DA group). Results: Fourteen articles (535 patients with 994 implants) were selected for qualitative analysis. Six of these were included in the meta-analysis. Five prostheses failed in the PA group and 1 failed in the DA group (P =.1047). Seven biologic complications occurred in the PA group and 6 occurred in the DA group (P =.8121). MBL was significantly less in the DA group (difference, 0.279 mm; P =.000). Greater buccal recession occurred in the PA group (difference, 0.198 mm; P =.0004). The PES evaluation showed no differences between groups (P =.289). Conclusions: Repeated abutment disconnections and reconnections considerably increased MBL and buccal recession. Further studies are needed to confirm these results. (C) 2017 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据