4.1 Article

Increased firing frequency of spontaneous action potentials in cerebellar Purkinje neurons of db/db mice results from altered auto-rhythmicity and diminished GABAergic tonic inhibition

期刊

GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOPHYSICS
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 29-41

出版社

GENERAL PHYSIOL AND BIOPHYSICS
DOI: 10.4149/gpb_2013056

关键词

Firing frequency; Leptin receptor; Patch clamp; Cerebellum; GABAergic inhibition

资金

  1. DGAPA-UNAM [IN222413]
  2. ICyTDF
  3. Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnologia del DF [PICSA10-116]
  4. SECITI (Secretaria de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion del DF) [039-2013]
  5. DGAPA-UNAM
  6. Ph. D. Program in Biomedical Sciences (UNAM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hormone leptin, by binding to hypothalamic receptors, suppresses food intake and decreases body adiposity. Leptin receptors are also widely expressed in extra-hypothalamic areas such as hippocampus, amygdala and cerebellum, where leptin modulates synaptic transmission. Here we show that a defective leptin receptor affects the electrophysiological properties of cerebellar Purkinje neurons (PNs). PNs from (db/db) mice recorded in cerebellar slices display a higher firing rate of spontaneous action potentials than PNs from wild type (WT) mice. Blockade of GABAergic tonic inhibition with bicuculline in WT mice changes the firing pattern from continuous, uninterrupted spiking into bursting firing, but bicuculline does not produce these alterations in db/db neurons, suggesting that they receive a weaker GABAergic inhibitory input. Our results also show that the intrinsic firing properties (auto-rhythmicity) of WT and db/db PNs are different. Tonic firing of PNs, the only efferent drive from the cerebellar cortex, is a persistent signal to downstream cerebellar targets. The significance of leptin modulation of PNs spontaneous firing is not known. Also, it is not clear if the increased excitability of cerebellar PNs in db/db mice results from hyperglycemia or from the lack of leptin signaling, since both conditions coexist in the db/db strain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据