4.2 Article

Intermittent aortic balloon occlusion combined with cesarean section for the treatment of patients with placenta previa complicated by placenta accreta: A retrospective study

期刊

JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 44, 期 9, 页码 1752-1760

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jog.13700

关键词

balloon catheter; cesarean section; intermittent aortic balloon occlusion; placenta accreta; placenta previa

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81401494]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimTo compare the efficacy of cesarean section (CS) combined with intermittent aortic balloon occlusion with that of CS alone for treating patients with placenta previa complicated by placenta accreta. MethodsForty-five patients with placenta previa complicated by placenta accreta who underwent CS were retrospectively studied. Twenty-two patients had undergone CS combined with intermittent aortic balloon occlusion (combination group) and 23 patients received conventional hemostatic support only (control group). The postpartum hemorrhage, transfusion requirements, operation time and recovery time, and the ability to preserve the uterus and fertility were analyzed. ResultsIntermittent aortic balloon occlusion significantly decreased the volume of blood loss in the combination group relative to the control group (597 359 mL vs 2687 +/- 575 mL; P < 0.001), and transfusion requirements were also reduced (498 +/- 195 mL vs 2390 +/- 789 mL; P <0.001). We observed shorter operation time in the combination group relative to the control group (63.8 +/- 12.3 min vs 118.8 +/- 22.4 min; P < 0.001), and fewer patients required uterine cavity stuffing followed by uterine artery embolization (n = 2 vs n = 10; P <0.05), uterine artery ligation (n = 1 vs n = 9; P < 0.05), and hysterectomy (n = 0 vs n =7; P < 0.05). ConclusionIntermittent aortic balloon occlusion may control postpartum hemorrhage in pregnancies complicated by placenta accreta, and improve the postoperative conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据