4.6 Review

Biomarkers of Nutrition for Development (BOND)-Iron Review

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 1001S-1067S

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxx036

关键词

iron; iron nutrition; iron status assessment; iron biology; iron biomarkers

资金

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  2. Division of Nutrition Research Coordination (DNRC, NIH)
  3. Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS, NIH)
  4. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD, NIH)
  5. PepsiCo
  6. Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS), National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  7. Division of Nutrition Research Coordination (DNRC), NIH
  8. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), NIH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This is the fifth in the series of reviews developed as part of the Biomarkers of Nutrition for Development (BOND) program. The BOND Iron Expert Panel (I-EP) reviewed the extant knowledge regarding iron biology, public health implications, and the relative usefulness of currently available biomarkers of iron status from deficiency to overload. Approaches to assessing intake, including bioavailability, are also covered. The report also covers technical and laboratory considerations for the use of available biomarkers of iron status, and concludes with a description of research priorities along with a brief discussion of new biomarkers with potential for use across the spectrum of activities related to the study of iron in human health. The I-EP concluded that current iron biomarkers are reliable for accurately assessing many aspects of iron nutrition. However, a clear distinction is made between the relative strengths of biomarkers to assess hematological consequences of iron deficiency versus other putative functional outcomes, particularly the relationship between maternal and fetal iron status during pregnancy, birth outcomes, and infant cognitive, motor and emotional development. The I-EP also highlighted the importance of considering the confounding effects of inflammation and infection on the interpretation of iron biomarker results, as well as the impact of life stage. Finally, alternative approaches to the evaluation of the risk for nutritional iron overload at the population level are presented, because the currently designated upper limits for the biomarker generally employed (serum ferritin) may not differentiate between true iron overload and the effects of subclinical inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据