4.5 Article

Nurses' Perceptions of Patient Safety Culture in Three Hospitals in Saudi Arabia

期刊

JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP
卷 50, 期 4, 页码 422-431

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jnu.12394

关键词

Clinical practice; hospitals; nurse; patient safety; patient safety culture; Saudi Arabia

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeTo assess the present patient safety culture of three general hospitals in Saudi Arabia, as perceived by nurses. DesignThis study utilized a descriptive, cross-sectional design. MethodsA convenience sample of 351 nurses working in three general hospitals in the central region of Saudi Arabia was surveyed in this study using the Hospital Survey of Patients' Safety Culture (HSOPSC) from October 2016 to April 2017. ResultsFrom the 12 composites of the HSOPSC, the nurses perceived only the following two patient safety areas as strengths: teamwork within units and organizational learning-continuous improvement. Six areas of patient safety were identified as weaknesses, namely overall perception of patient safety, handoffs and transitions, communication openness, staffing, frequency of events reported, and nonpunitive response to errors. Nationality, educational attainment, hospital, length of service in the hospital, work area or unit, length of service in the current work area or unit, current position, and direct patient contact or interaction were significant predictors of the nurses' perceived patient safety culture. ConclusionsThe findings in this study clarify the current status of patient safety culture in three hospitals in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Clinical RelevanceThe present findings should be considered by policymakers, hospital leaders, and nurse executives in creating interventions aimed at improving the patient safety culture in hospitals. A multidimensional network intervention targeting the different dimensions of patient safety culture and involving different organizational levels should be implemented to improve patient safety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据