4.5 Article

MCC950, the Selective Inhibitor of Nucleotide Oligomerization Domain (NOD)-Like Receptor Protein-3 Inflammasome, Protects Mice against Traumatic Brain Injury

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
卷 35, 期 11, 页码 1294-1303

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2017.5344

关键词

edema; inflammation; MCC950; neurological deficits; NLRP3-inflammasome inhibitor; traumatic brain injury

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-NS097800]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nucleotide oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptor protein-3 (NLRP3) inflammasome may intimately contribute to sustaining damage after traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study aims to examine whether specific modulation of NLPR3 inflammasome by MCC950, a novel selective NLRP3 inhibitor, confers protection after experimental TBI. Unilateral cortical impact injury was induced in young adult C57BL/6 mice. MCC950 (50 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) or saline was administration at 1 and 3 h post-TBI. Animals were tested for neurological function and then sacrificed at 24 or 72 h post-TBI. Immunoblotting and histological analysis were performed to identify markers of NLRP3 inflammasome and proapoptotic activity in pericontusional areas of the brains at 24 or 72h post-TBI. MCC950 treatment provided a significant improvement in neurological function and reduced cerebral edema in TBI animals. TBI upregulated NLRP3, apoptosis-associated speck-like adapter protein (ASC), cleaved caspase-1, and interlukein-1 beta (IL-1 beta) in the perilesional area. MCC950 efficiently repressed caspase-1 and IL-1 beta with a transient effect on ASC and NLRP3 post-TBI. MCC950 treatment also provided protection against proapoptotic activation of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase and caspase-3 associated with TBI. A concurrent inhibition of inflammasome priming was also detectable at the nuclear factor kappa B/p65 and caspase-1 level. Our findings support the implication of NLRP3 inflammasome in the pathogenesis of TBI and further suggests the therapeutic potential of MCC950.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据