4.4 Review

Structural modularity and grid activity in the medial entorhinal cortex

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 119, 期 6, 页码 2129-2144

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00574.2017

关键词

cortical modules; entorhinal cortex; grid cells; hippocampus; spatial navigation

资金

  1. Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience (CIN) at the Eberhard Karls University of Tubingen [CIN is an Excellence Cluster - Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) within the Excellence Initiative] [EXC 307]
  2. DFG [BU 3126/1-1]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31741059]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Following the groundbreaking discovery of grid cells, the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) has become the focus of intense anatomical, physiological, and computational investigations. Whether and how grid activity maps onto cell types and cortical architecture is still an open question. Fundamental similarities in microcircuits, function, and connectivity suggest a homology between rodent MEC and human posteromedial entorhinal cortex. Both are specialized for spatial processing and display similar cellular organization, consisting of layer 2 pyramidal/calbindin cell patches superimposed on scattered stellate neurons. Recent data indicate the existence of a further nonoverlapping modular system (zinc patches) within the superficial MEC layers. Zinc and calbindin patches have been shown to receive largely segregated inputs from the presubiculum and parasubiculum. Grid cells are also clustered in the MEC, and we discuss possible structure-function schemes on how grid activity could map onto cortical patch systems. We hypothesize that in the superficial layers of the MEC, anatomical location can be predictive of function; thus relating functional properties and neuronal morphologies to the cortical modules will be necessary for resolving how grid activity maps onto cortical architecture. Imaging or cell identification approaches in freely moving animals will be required for testing this hypothesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据