4.6 Article

Functional neurological disorders in Parkinson disease

期刊

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2017-317378

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCATS NIH HHS [KL2 TR001426] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL125016] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIAID NIH HHS [R21 AI118228] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM063483] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To ascertain demographic and clinical features of Parkinson disease (PD) associated with functional neurological features. Methods A standardised form was used to extract data from electronic records of 53 PD patients with associated functional neurological disorders (PD-FND) across eight movement disorders centres in the USA, Canada and Europe. These subjects were matched for age, gender and disease duration to PD patients without functional features (PD-only). Logistic regression analysis was used to compare both groups after adjusting for clustering effect. Results Functional symptoms preceded or co-occurred with PD onset in 34% of cases, nearly always in the most affected body side. Compared with PD-only subjects, PD-FND were predominantly female (68%), had longer delay to PD diagnosis, greater prevalence of dyskinesia (42% vs 18%; P=0.023), worse depression and anxiety (P=0.033 and 0.025, respectively), higher levodopaequivalent daily dose (972 +/- 701 vs 741 +/- 559 mg; P=0.029) and lower motor severity (P=0.019). These patients also exhibited greater healthcare resource utilisation, higher use of [(123)I]FP-CIT SPECT and were more likely to have had a pre-existing psychiatric disorder (P=0.008) and family history of PD (P=0.036). Conclusions A subtype of PD with functional neurological features is familial in one-fourth of cases and associated with more psychiatric than motor disability and greater use of diagnostic and healthcare resources than those without functional features. Functional manifestations may be prodromal to PD in one-third of patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据