4.7 Article

Two-year real-life efficacy, tolerability and safety of dimethyl fumarate in an Italian multicentre study

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
卷 265, 期 8, 页码 1850-1859

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-018-8916-6

关键词

Real-life study; Dimethyl fumarate; DMF; Multiple sclerosis; MS; Real-world study

资金

  1. Biogen Idec
  2. Novartis
  3. Sanofi-Aventis
  4. Teva
  5. Merck
  6. Genzyme
  7. Almirall
  8. Biogen
  9. Merck Serono
  10. Bayer Schering Pharma
  11. Bayer Schering
  12. Bayer
  13. BiogenIdec
  14. Italian Multiple Sclerosis Society
  15. Fondazione Ricerca Biomedica ONLUS
  16. San Luigi ONLUS
  17. Regione Piemonte
  18. Associazione Ricerca Biomedica ONLUS
  19. Biogen Italy
  20. Teva Pharmaceuticals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Dimethyl-fumarate (DMF) demonstrated efficacy and safety in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) in randomized clinical trials. Objectives To track and evaluate post-market DMF profile in real-world setting. Materials and methods Patients receiving DMF referred to Italian MS centres were enrolled and prospectively followed, collecting demographic clinical and radiological data. Results Among the 735 included patients, 45.4% were naive to disease-modifying therapies, 17.8% switched to DMF because of tolerance, 27.4% switched to DMF because of lack of efficacy, and 9.4% switched to DMF because of safety concerns. Median DMF exposure was 17 months (0-33). DMF reduced the annual relapse rate (ARR) by 63.2%. At 12 and 24 months, 85 and 76% of patients were relapse-free. NEDA-3 status after 12 months of DMF treatment was maintained by 47.5% of patients. 89 and 70% of patients at 12 and 24 months regularly continued DMF. Most frequent adverse events (AEs) were flushing (37.2%) and gastro-enteric AEs (31.1%). Conclusion Our post-market study corroborated that DMF is a safe and effective drug. Additionally, the study suggested that naive patients strongly benefit from DMF and that DMF improved ARR also in patients who were horizontally switched from injectable therapies due to tolerability and efficacy issues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据