4.3 Article

The effect of tree cover on the biomass and diversity of the herbaceous layer in a Mediterranean dehesa

期刊

GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE
卷 70, 期 4, 页码 639-650

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gfs.12161

关键词

tree-grass interaction; alpha diversity; beta diversity; dry matter

类别

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport
  2. Spanish National Plan I+D+I in the programme of Agricultural Resources and Technologies [RTA2009-00110]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mediterranean dehesas are an archetypal example of high nature value farmland in Europe. To better understand the interactions between trees and grasslands in the conservation and management of the dehesa, we measured, over 3years, the contribution of scattered trees to the diversity and biomass dry-matter (DM) yield of the herb layer and the relationship between the herb layer (biomass and diversity interaction) and the trees. The study was based on 135 subplots representing four aspects and three distances from fifteen trees selected randomly in a plot within a dehesa in central Spain. The specific questions were the following: (i) To what extent do trees affect biomass of the herbaceous layer? (ii) What is the relationship between herbaceous layer biomass and species diversity under the influence of trees? and (iii) What are the effects of trees and small-scale topography on the herbaceous diversity? Results differed between years depending on water availability. Legume and forb DM yields were highest at the edge of the tree crown and beyond the canopy. Species richness was positively related to legume DM yield, and both were higher at the bottom of the hillside, especially in dry conditions. Given the importance of tree influence on the biomass and diversity of grasslands, maintaining proper agroforestry management practices for trees and grasslands is important for conserving dehesa diversity and productivity under the conditions of high climatic and soil variability in Mediterranean dehesas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据